Összehasonlított verziók

Kulcs

  • Beillesztett sor.
  • Törölt sor.
  • Formázás megváltoztatva.

...

Recommendation Tables for Knowledge Ecosystem Steps

Identify

...

Studies [Consider Merging this into Synthesize Evidence Table]


General RecommendationsAnticoagulationTesting/TriageOther (Long COVID, Vaccine, Steroids)
Key Definitions and Frameworks



What to know/do Overview



Input Sources
  • For steroids systematic meta-review, 8 sources have been identified these are (MEDLINE, CORD-19, L-OVE/Episteminokos, NIH iSearch COVID-19, EuropePMC, WHO COVID-19 Database, EMBASE + Prospero) 
Search Strategies



Output Repositories



Standards



Initiatives
  • Librarian Reserve Corps
    • COVID-Evidence Project - building a database to gather all the evidence around a drug (University of Basil - currently focused on hydroxychloroquine, but model could be adaptable to other targets)
    • Identification of sources to identify primary studies - validation study of specialized COVID-19 databases (systematic reviewers are going to different sources - this effort is to identify best practices)
    • Advocate for librarian representation in searches and reviews - leverage skillsets/best practices in this work
      [SLMC]: close gaps between needs that clinicians are seeing on the front line and topics covered in reviews guidelines
  • COKA Evidence/ Tools WG [Project Google Drive](work in process)



Tools/ Platforms



Other Best Practices


...


General RecommendationsAnticoagulationTesting/TriageOther (Long COVID, Vaccine, Steroids)
Key Definitions and Frameworks
  • includes evaluation of quality of evidence 
  • also needs to address processing of real world evidence
  • [weave in ICER - search ISER opioids]



What to know/do Overview
  • For people creating evidence syntheses
    • See if work on planned topic has been done already - search L*VE/Epistemonikos (2K reviews - cover many questions - only a fraction registered in PROSPERO; most reviews are out of date - only 3% have all the trials they should), PROSPERO for what's in the pipeline. Make sure that any existing reviews look at outcomes that are pertinent to your needs [leverage COMET - outcome measures], etc. that of interest for the need at hand. Very hard for user to identify a review that's up to date. COVID-END repository of Best Evidence Syntheses can be helpful here.
    • Need to have access to raw data that fed into the review so it's more re-usable.
    • important to understand end-user needs so that the review can be aimed at addressing them
    • AHRQ has methods guides, Cochrane has them. Are there tools for this on COVID - e.g., Resources and tools for researchers considering and conducting
      COVID-19 evidence syntheses
       (From COVID-END Synthesizing WG)
  • For organizations consuming evidence syntheses
    • For selecting/using synthesized evidence: Is there a GRADE evidence profile? Do they make quality assessments? How comprehensive are they? Search date



Input Sources
Output Repositories


Standards


Initiatives


Tools/ Platforms


Other Best Practices
  • COVID-NMA has initiated communication with all trialists to try to ensure consistent approaches e.g. selection of outcomes, reduction of risk of bias, and to invite them to contribute missing data. 
  • Framework slides: Applying Standards to the Evidence Domain (from the COKA Evidence Ecosystem Liaison WG)



...


General RecommendationsAnticoagulationTesting/TriageOther (Long COVID, Vaccine, Steroids)
Key Definitions and Frameworks



What to know/do Overview



Input Sources
  • See Output Repositories from Synthesize Evidence table

Output Repositories


Standards



Initiatives



Tools/ Platforms


Other Best Practices


...