...

Background

The ACTS Roadmap - and the this ACTS COVID-19 Guidance to Action Collaborative and Learning Community - focus on improving the cycle whereby evidence gets translated into knowledge and tools that support care delivery/improvement actions which generates data about results, which feeds into evidence, and so on. This page presents various diagram that have been developed to depict this cycle, and the element elements that support and drive it. These diagrams are being integrated and refined by Collaborative participants to clarify how various efforts focused on the cycle can come together more efficiently and effectively in achieving to achieve shared goals and driving drive progress toward executing the ACTS Roadmap.

...

2.More detailed ACTS current/future state LHS/Knowledge Ecosystem Cycle

3. The diagram below is part of a slide deck prepared for ACTS by Per Olav Vandvik and Linn Brandt from the MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation. [slide 2 in the MAGIC deck has an editable version of the diagram copied below.]

...

Learning Community participants are adapting this diagram to reflect components of the evidence/knowledge/guidance ecosystem

...

they are addressing, e.g.,  with living CDS interventions for specific COVID-19 targets (and ultimately many other topics beyond).

  Full deck

...

is here: 

...

from MAGIC - Solutions Evidence Ecosystem for ACTS October 28 2019 (2).pptx

...

...

View file
name from MAGIC - Solutions Evidence Ecosystem for ACTS October 28 2019 (2).pptx page Overviews/Diagrams of Evidence/Knowledge/Quality Ecosystem space COV height 250

4. Quality Ecosystem - FHIR Standards (Maria Michaels version)

...

• name

    Full deck found here:  

  View file

  From Alper - Evidence Ecosystem image set 2020.pptx

  height150

6. Mary Butler/UMN-EPC Ecosystem Diagram  

JO Notes on this EPC diagram - are there opportunities to:

• tie 'topic nomination' more closely to care transformation initiatives (e.g., as in ACTS COVID Guidance to Action Collaborative)? (currently there can be open nominations, but typically nominations only proceed if there is an 'adoption partner'; growing attention to feeding LHS efforts)
• leverage standards more fully to improve FAIRness of information flowing into reviews and applying reviews more seamlessly to guidance/CDS/eCQM development? e.g., as outlined in table at top of this page. (SRDR/EPCs and others working on this)
• tighten connections/collaborations between 'NextGen' offerings (more computable/concise/user-friendly/interactive evidence summaries) and those who can benefit from integrating that information into guidance and CDS offerings downstream? (there's important application nuance in the reports)
• otherwise more tightly integrate the EPC/SRDR products and processes with broader efforts (e.g., ACTS COVID Guidance to Action Collaborative and other related efforts) in mutually beneficial ways?   

• Full deck found here: Butler V3 UMN Ecosystem image.pptx